Note that a locally constant sheaf is nothing more than a covering space. The definitions of constant and locally constant sheaf are sometimes given in a confusing and misleading way. Correct category theoretic notions should be given up to isomorphism. Given a space and an object there is a presheaf which yields on every open set and whose restriction map is . This generates a sheaf . We say that a sheaf on a space is a locally constant sheaf if has a cover such that on each component of the cover it is isomorphic to a sheaf of the form . Monodromy is an abstract way at looking at the liftings of a closed path to a covering space.
Exercise: A locally constant sheaf on is a constant sheaf, that is, is isomorphic to a sheaf of the form . More generally: a locally constant sheaf on a simply connected space is a constant sheaf.
For an abelian sheaf, we define . Show that need not be closed. Consider the sheaf and fix a point in a Hausdorff space . Then define for and otherwise for some abelian group . Then clearly is not closed. Do not confuse the support of an abelian sheaf with the support of a section over , the points of in which . is indeed closed and this follows essentially from the algebraic constraint on restriction map homomorphisms where the image of must be . Thus the stalk of a zero section must be zero.
Exercise: Show that sections of locally constant abelian sheaf have closed support (hence unique extensions). Hint: suppose that . Then there is an open set and a section which represents . But since is locally constant we can assume, by taking intersections, that is isomorphic to a constant sheaf for a given group . But then clearly we must have for all and hence the complement of is open.
Thus (locally) constant abelian sheaves are abstract versions of many important properties of holomorphic functions.
A locally constant sheaf on a simply connected topological space is a constant sheaf. This follows from homotopy invariance of unique extensions. This is perhaps the most fundamental result about locally constant sheaves; more generally this would be the result concerning the representation of the fundamental group based at by automorphisms of the stalk at .
No comments:
Post a Comment